The marvelous findings of the MaiMwana trial: does a 76% drop in maternal mortality get your attention?
Impressive. In short, that describes the results of the [MaiMwana trial in Malawi](
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796349/) which was reported in mid-2013. When written up in the usual format for a medical journal, sometimes spectacular results don't shine. You want to take a highlighter and just write "Amazing" to get across the point. A 52-76% decrease in maternal mortality in just three years?
Before the [MaiMwana trial](http://www.maimwana.malawi.net/MaiMwana/Home.html) in rural Malawi, there had been no trials (population base trials) on the effect of community mobilization (community action cycle) of participatory women's groups on birth outcomes in Africa and according to the authors, just a single trial on exclusive breastfeeding (how can this be?). The community mobilization tested in this study was the formation of women's groups led by trained facilitators (mothers also from the community). To get a sense of the women's groups you can [see a short film here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcCAwLleFx4).
The community mobilization method was actually developed in Bolivia with the WARMI project and then used in the Makwanpur study in Nepal. Each group progressed through a community mobilization action cycle based on the women's group model. The community mobilization cycle is described here in the [Malawi Medical Journal](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3345770/). The cycle includes 20 participatory community meetings involving problem identification, teaching cards and peer support; problem identification, solution identification, planning and evaluation these are the four stages of the cycle in a nutshell).
The study used a very specific methodology to follow tens of thousands of pregnant women over close to five years-- in the end the data covered over 26,000 births. Some groups got the women's group intervention, some got the peer counselors for breastfeeding, some got both intervention and one set of groups got no interventions.
The results are really important for the maternal health community. For years 2 and 3, after exclusion of data from the first year (establishment) of the trial, the maternal mortality ratio was reduced by 52% overall. Maternal mortality in the group that received both the peer counselors for breastfeeding as well as the women's group community mobilization, maternal mortality fell an incredible 76% just over the three years of the study. In the set of areas that had just women's groups but not peer counseling, maternal mortality still fell 60 percent.
The authors report the following costs of the interventions, including the health systems strengthening costs briefly here:
The mean costs per year were $16·6 per infant (women’s group), $6·3 per infant (volunteer peer counseling), and $5·6 per woman of childbearing age (women’s group). Health service strengthening added $1·6 and monitoring and assessment $5·4 per woman of childbearing age.
In short, the results were nothing short of impressive. At this point the benefits of women's groups for pregnancy support and outcomes have been studied in Latin America, Nepal and now in Malawi. Time to replicate! What are we waiting for at this point?
credit: the photo is from the MaiMwana study site website.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796349/) which was reported in mid-2013. When written up in the usual format for a medical journal, sometimes spectacular results don't shine. You want to take a highlighter and just write "Amazing" to get across the point. A 52-76% decrease in maternal mortality in just three years?
Before the [MaiMwana trial](http://www.maimwana.malawi.net/MaiMwana/Home.html) in rural Malawi, there had been no trials (population base trials) on the effect of community mobilization (community action cycle) of participatory women's groups on birth outcomes in Africa and according to the authors, just a single trial on exclusive breastfeeding (how can this be?). The community mobilization tested in this study was the formation of women's groups led by trained facilitators (mothers also from the community). To get a sense of the women's groups you can [see a short film here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcCAwLleFx4).
The community mobilization method was actually developed in Bolivia with the WARMI project and then used in the Makwanpur study in Nepal. Each group progressed through a community mobilization action cycle based on the women's group model. The community mobilization cycle is described here in the [Malawi Medical Journal](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3345770/). The cycle includes 20 participatory community meetings involving problem identification, teaching cards and peer support; problem identification, solution identification, planning and evaluation these are the four stages of the cycle in a nutshell).
The study used a very specific methodology to follow tens of thousands of pregnant women over close to five years-- in the end the data covered over 26,000 births. Some groups got the women's group intervention, some got the peer counselors for breastfeeding, some got both intervention and one set of groups got no interventions.
The results are really important for the maternal health community. For years 2 and 3, after exclusion of data from the first year (establishment) of the trial, the maternal mortality ratio was reduced by 52% overall. Maternal mortality in the group that received both the peer counselors for breastfeeding as well as the women's group community mobilization, maternal mortality fell an incredible 76% just over the three years of the study. In the set of areas that had just women's groups but not peer counseling, maternal mortality still fell 60 percent.
The authors report the following costs of the interventions, including the health systems strengthening costs briefly here:
The mean costs per year were $16·6 per infant (women’s group), $6·3 per infant (volunteer peer counseling), and $5·6 per woman of childbearing age (women’s group). Health service strengthening added $1·6 and monitoring and assessment $5·4 per woman of childbearing age.
In short, the results were nothing short of impressive. At this point the benefits of women's groups for pregnancy support and outcomes have been studied in Latin America, Nepal and now in Malawi. Time to replicate! What are we waiting for at this point?
credit: the photo is from the MaiMwana study site website.
Leave a comment
Comments will be approved before showing up.
Also in The Maternova Blog
Expansion of the Pratt Pouch to Four Maternity Hospitals in Ecuador and to Peru
The Pratt pouches are practical, easy to store, properly labeled, and contain accurate doses tailored to each newborn’s weight. This reduces the likelihood of dosing errors and enhances treatment adherence. In addition, newborns have shown good tolerance to the medication in this format.
Reviewing the Studies on the Pratt Pouch Implementation in Africa Thus Far
The Pratt Pouch was found to be very cost-effective in the context of Uganda, a country where PMTCT is a serious issue to prevent transmission of HIV from mother to child.
A technological 'ChARM' to help diagnose pneumonia in the community
Respiratory Rate measurement is critical to WHO IMCI guidelines and determination of childhood pneumonia. The ChARM is an innovation that automates this crucial process.
