The marvelous findings of the MaiMwana trial: does a 76% drop in maternal mortality get your attention?
Impressive. In short, that describes the results of the [MaiMwana trial in Malawi](
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796349/) which was reported in mid-2013. When written up in the usual format for a medical journal, sometimes spectacular results don't shine. You want to take a highlighter and just write "Amazing" to get across the point. A 52-76% decrease in maternal mortality in just three years?
Before the [MaiMwana trial](http://www.maimwana.malawi.net/MaiMwana/Home.html) in rural Malawi, there had been no trials (population base trials) on the effect of community mobilization (community action cycle) of participatory women's groups on birth outcomes in Africa and according to the authors, just a single trial on exclusive breastfeeding (how can this be?). The community mobilization tested in this study was the formation of women's groups led by trained facilitators (mothers also from the community). To get a sense of the women's groups you can [see a short film here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcCAwLleFx4).
The community mobilization method was actually developed in Bolivia with the WARMI project and then used in the Makwanpur study in Nepal. Each group progressed through a community mobilization action cycle based on the women's group model. The community mobilization cycle is described here in the [Malawi Medical Journal](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3345770/). The cycle includes 20 participatory community meetings involving problem identification, teaching cards and peer support; problem identification, solution identification, planning and evaluation these are the four stages of the cycle in a nutshell).
The study used a very specific methodology to follow tens of thousands of pregnant women over close to five years-- in the end the data covered over 26,000 births. Some groups got the women's group intervention, some got the peer counselors for breastfeeding, some got both intervention and one set of groups got no interventions.
The results are really important for the maternal health community. For years 2 and 3, after exclusion of data from the first year (establishment) of the trial, the maternal mortality ratio was reduced by 52% overall. Maternal mortality in the group that received both the peer counselors for breastfeeding as well as the women's group community mobilization, maternal mortality fell an incredible 76% just over the three years of the study. In the set of areas that had just women's groups but not peer counseling, maternal mortality still fell 60 percent.
The authors report the following costs of the interventions, including the health systems strengthening costs briefly here:
The mean costs per year were $16·6 per infant (women’s group), $6·3 per infant (volunteer peer counseling), and $5·6 per woman of childbearing age (women’s group). Health service strengthening added $1·6 and monitoring and assessment $5·4 per woman of childbearing age.
In short, the results were nothing short of impressive. At this point the benefits of women's groups for pregnancy support and outcomes have been studied in Latin America, Nepal and now in Malawi. Time to replicate! What are we waiting for at this point?
credit: the photo is from the MaiMwana study site website.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3796349/) which was reported in mid-2013. When written up in the usual format for a medical journal, sometimes spectacular results don't shine. You want to take a highlighter and just write "Amazing" to get across the point. A 52-76% decrease in maternal mortality in just three years?
Before the [MaiMwana trial](http://www.maimwana.malawi.net/MaiMwana/Home.html) in rural Malawi, there had been no trials (population base trials) on the effect of community mobilization (community action cycle) of participatory women's groups on birth outcomes in Africa and according to the authors, just a single trial on exclusive breastfeeding (how can this be?). The community mobilization tested in this study was the formation of women's groups led by trained facilitators (mothers also from the community). To get a sense of the women's groups you can [see a short film here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcCAwLleFx4).
The community mobilization method was actually developed in Bolivia with the WARMI project and then used in the Makwanpur study in Nepal. Each group progressed through a community mobilization action cycle based on the women's group model. The community mobilization cycle is described here in the [Malawi Medical Journal](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3345770/). The cycle includes 20 participatory community meetings involving problem identification, teaching cards and peer support; problem identification, solution identification, planning and evaluation these are the four stages of the cycle in a nutshell).
The study used a very specific methodology to follow tens of thousands of pregnant women over close to five years-- in the end the data covered over 26,000 births. Some groups got the women's group intervention, some got the peer counselors for breastfeeding, some got both intervention and one set of groups got no interventions.
The results are really important for the maternal health community. For years 2 and 3, after exclusion of data from the first year (establishment) of the trial, the maternal mortality ratio was reduced by 52% overall. Maternal mortality in the group that received both the peer counselors for breastfeeding as well as the women's group community mobilization, maternal mortality fell an incredible 76% just over the three years of the study. In the set of areas that had just women's groups but not peer counseling, maternal mortality still fell 60 percent.
The authors report the following costs of the interventions, including the health systems strengthening costs briefly here:
The mean costs per year were $16·6 per infant (women’s group), $6·3 per infant (volunteer peer counseling), and $5·6 per woman of childbearing age (women’s group). Health service strengthening added $1·6 and monitoring and assessment $5·4 per woman of childbearing age.
In short, the results were nothing short of impressive. At this point the benefits of women's groups for pregnancy support and outcomes have been studied in Latin America, Nepal and now in Malawi. Time to replicate! What are we waiting for at this point?
credit: the photo is from the MaiMwana study site website.
Laisser un commentaire
Les commentaires sont approuvés avant leur publication.
Voir l'article entier
Pumani bubble CPAP
The Pumani bubble CPAP was engineered by a team at Rice University in Texas, working in collaboration with clinicians in Malawi. A range of specific design considerations made the Pumani especially appropriate for low-resource settings so that parts are easy to replace.
The MaternaWell Tray for PPH estimation now appears in key obstetric guidelines
A 'tray' is now mentioned in the FIGO/WHO/ICM Consolidated Postpartum Hemorrhage Guidelines published by in 2025, expanding the type of monitoring device from drape to drape or tray.
Is it ethical to separate mother and infant just after birth?
Immediate skin to skin care means less than ten minutes after the infant takes its first breath, the infant, naked except for a diaper, spends at least one hour on the mother’s chest, against her skin. It is recommended that preterm and low birth weight kangaroo care involve prolonging contact beyond the first hour for at least 8 hours per day or as long as possible (up to 24 hours) per day
