• Ajoutez une description, des images, des menus et des liens à votre méga-menu

  • Une colonne sans paramètres peut être utilisée comme un espaceur

  • Lien vers vos collections, vos ventes et même des liens externes

  • Ajoutez jusqu'à cinq colonnes

  • mars 29, 2020 3 lire la lecture

    We witnessed something remarkable over the last couple of months as the global maker community went to work to fight Covid19.  

    While the federal governments fought amongst themselves and passed a hot potato of blame back and forth, while the states bickered and the hospitals dithered and denied that there was a problem, even punishing their own health workers who spoke up about impending shortages, the DIY, Maker and 3D Printing communities dove into  hive mind  and ignited a remarkable wave of collective action to fill the void. 

    They started with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) focusing on laser cutting face shields, seeming to delegate cloth sewn surgical masks to a more dispersed army of people with sewing machines and textile manufacturing.  The face shield crowd shared open source designs, debated over the length of the front piece and the minimum thickness of the shield and gave each other tips about the ideal material for making the shield and the specifications for attaching the shield to a 3D printed visor.  From Portugal to Portsmouth NH, militias of 3D printing afficionados, some with whole 'farms' of machines, and others with a garage of 1 to 3 machines at a time, began printing face shields in time to the drumbeat of reports that came in from Italy and then Spain (and now the United States) about the unfathomable shortage of basic equipment (#GetmePPE). 

    6-8 weeks into the heart of the pandemic, a Czech company, founded by Josef Prusa, Prusa3D (Prusa Research a.s.) and the maker of the Original Prusa i3 3D printer emerged as a clear forerunner in the (very) collegial 'competition.'  By March 27th their open source design had been downloaded 100,000 times and a Michigan Hospital Procurement had approved the PRUSA Protective Face Shield-RT3.  The company has donated 12,000 shields and can print 3000 a day.  

    In the United States, NIH has approved a 3D printed design as well.  Put forth quickly and without fanfare by the Design that Matters team from Massachusetts, the design is credited to PRUSA's RT2 version. 

    The Facebook Group, Open Source COVID19 Medical Supplies, is a hive of activity which leverages the hive mind of 53,000 makers and members (as of March 28, 2020).  When the group began it was a flurry of innovative ideas and rapid prototyping. As they have become more and more organized and streamlined, the best ideas rise to the top and the new members are encouraged to 1) first research what is already working and 2) make sure they are making based upon the request of a specific hospital.  Members of the group include photos of them wearing their designs, but most importantly, they share the designs and alert the group when a hospital approves their design.  For example, "Another DIY Face shield design, assembled in under 60 seconds for ~$1 It's being accepted by a wide variety of Los Angeles area hospitals including Cedars Sinai, UCLA, Torrance Memorial, MLK and more."  The 'stamp of approval' from the hospitals validates the efforts of the makers and fabricators churning out face shields in 3D printer farms across the world, adding a wind beneath their sails as the race against the virus.

    This blog will be followed by our observations about rapid immunoassay tests, PCR testing as well as the parallel open source innovating for ventilators.

    The energy, industriousness and collegial collective action propelled by a globally distributed group of highly practical makers stands in stark contrast to the petty shortsightedness of heads of state around the world.  If only we could harness more makers, more quickly.

    Meg Wirth

    Laisser un commentaire

    Les commentaires sont approuvés avant leur publication.


    Voir l'article entier

    Medical Devices for Hospitals and NGOs: How to Source the Right products for Maternal and Newborn Care
    Dispositifs médicaux pour les hôpitaux et les ONG : comment acheter les bons produits pour les soins maternels et néonatals

    juin 30, 2026 13 lire la lecture

    Voir l'article entier
    The High Quality Maternova Non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG)
    Le vêtement antichoc non pneumatique (NASG) Maternova de haute qualité

    mai 25, 2026 1 lire la lecture

    Des vêtements antichoc non-pneumatiques (NASG) de haute qualité, conformes à la norme ISO 13485 et marqués CE, produits par Maternova pour être utilisés par les sages-femmes et les obstétriciens du monde entier afin de sauver des vies menacées par l'hémorragie post-partum. Nos NASG respectent les normes les plus strictes et sont approuvés par des centaines de cliniciens.

    Voir l'article entier
    A $.03 pill that could prevent maternal deaths; Part 4
    Une pilule à 0,03 $ qui pourrait prévenir les décès maternels ; 4ème partie

    mai 25, 2026 3 lire la lecture

    L'USPSTF, l'ACOG, la Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine et la FIGO recommandent toutes l'aspirine à faible dose (LDA) pour les grossesses à haut risque. Les obstacles sont systémiques, comportementaux et structurels.

    Voir l'article entier